Systems and methods for controlling longitudinal acceleration based on lateral objects

ABSTRACT

Disclosed herein are systems, methods, and computer program products for controlling acceleration of a vehicle. The methods comprising: detecting a lateral distance from a point on a trajectory of the vehicle to an object the vehicle is expected to pass when following the trajectory, the object being located off of and to a side of the trajectory and the point representing a future location of the vehicle while passing the object; comparing the lateral distance to a threshold value; selecting whether acceleration limiting is to be performed by the vehicle based on whether the lateral distance is less than the threshold value; and causing the vehicle to perform operations for autonomous driving with or without acceleration limiting based on said selecting.

BACKGROUND

Modern day vehicles have at least one on-board computer and haveinternet/satellite connectivity. The software running on these on-boardcomputers monitor and/or control operations of the vehicles. The vehiclealso comprises monocular or stereo cameras and/or lidar detectors fordetecting objects in proximity thereto. The cameras capture images of ascene. The lidar detectors generate lidar datasets that measure thedistance from the vehicle to an object at a plurality of differenttimes. These images and distance measurements can be used for detectingand tracking movements of the object, making predictions as to theobject's trajectory, and planning paths of travel for the vehicle basedon the predicted objects trajectory.

A travel plan for a vehicle may comprise a spatial plan (for example, atrajectory defined by x-coordinates, y-coordinates and yawdisplacements) and a speed plan (for example, velocity value(s),longitudinal acceleration parameter value(s) and/or decelerationparameter value(s)). The acceleration of the vehicle may be limited inaccordance with an adaptive control feature which is governed by controlparameters that provide limits on acceleration. The acceleration can belimited based on a pre-defined maximum value or a value determined basedon road conditions. These acceleration limiting approaches can cause thevehicle to accelerate uncomfortably when passing moving objects that arenearby.

This document describes methods and systems that are directed toaddressing the problems described above, and/or other issues.

SUMMARY

The present disclosure concerns implementing systems and methods forcontrolling acceleration of a vehicle. The methods comprise: detecting,by a computing device, a lateral distance from a point on a trajectoryof the vehicle to an object the vehicle is expected to pass whenfollowing the trajectory (the object being located off of and to a sideof the trajectory and the point representing a future location of thevehicle while passing the object); comparing, by the computing device,the lateral distance to a threshold value; selecting, by the computingdevice, whether acceleration limiting is to be performed by the vehiclebased on whether the lateral distance is less than the threshold value;and causing, by the computing device, the vehicle to perform operationsfor autonomous driving with or without acceleration limiting based onthe selecting.

Additionally or alternatively, the methods may comprise: detecting, by acomputing device, a lateral distance from a point on a trajectory of thevehicle to a first object the vehicle is expected to pass when followingthe trajectory (where the first object is located off of and to a sideof the trajectory and the point representing a future location of thevehicle while passing the first object); selecting, by the computingdevice, whether acceleration limiting is to be performed by the vehiclebased on the lateral distance; obtaining an amount by which theacceleration of the vehicle is to be limited, when a selection is madethat acceleration limiting is to be performed by the vehicle; andcausing, by the computing device, the vehicle to perform operations forautonomous driving with limiting of acceleration by the obtained amount.

Additionally or alternatively, the methods may comprise: compriseperforming the following operations by computing device(s): detecting alateral distance from a point on a trajectory of the vehicle to a firstobject the vehicle is expected to pass when following the trajectory;selecting whether acceleration limiting is to be performed by thevehicle based on the lateral distance; obtaining a margin of the vehicledefined by a sequence of points; obtaining an amount by which theacceleration of the vehicle is to be limited based on the trajectory andthe margin of the vehicle, when a selection is made that accelerationlimiting is to be performed by the vehicle; and causing the vehicle toperform operations for autonomous driving with limiting of accelerationby the obtained amount.

The implementing systems can comprise: a processor; and a non-transitorycomputer-readable storage medium comprising programming instructionsthat are configured to cause the processor to implement a method foroperating an automated system. The above-described methods can also beimplemented by a computer program product comprising memory andprogramming instructions that are configured to cause a processor toperform operations.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The accompanying drawings are incorporated herein and form a part of thespecification.

FIG. 1 is an illustration of an illustrative system.

FIG. 2 is an illustration of an illustrative architecture for a vehicle.

FIG. 3 is an illustration of an illustrative computing device.

FIG. 4 provides a block diagram of an illustrative vehicle trajectoryplanning process.

FIG. 5 provides a flow diagram of an illustrative method for selectivelycontrolling longitudinal acceleration of a vehicle.

FIGS. 6-7 each provides an illustration that is useful for understandingwhen acceleration limiting may be selectively performed.

FIG. 8 provides a flow diagram of another illustrative method forselectively controlling longitudinal acceleration of a vehicle.

FIGS. 9-11 each provides an illustration that is useful forunderstanding when acceleration limiting may be selectively performed.

FIG. 12 provides a flow diagram of another illustrative method forselectively controlling longitudinal acceleration of a vehicle.

FIGS. 13-15 each provides an illustration that is useful forunderstanding when acceleration limiting may be selectively performed.

FIG. 16 provides a flow diagram of an illustrative method fordetermining an amount by which vehicle acceleration is limited.

FIG. 17 provides an illustration that is useful for understanding how anamount of acceleration is limited in accordance with the method shown inFIG. 16 .

FIG. 18 provides graphs showing how acceleration is limited based oncertain criteria.

FIG. 19 provides a flow diagram of another illustrative method fordetermining an amount by which vehicle acceleration is limited.

FIG. 20 provides an illustration that is useful for understanding how anamount of acceleration is limited in accordance with the method shown inFIG. 19 .

FIG. 21 provides graphs showing how acceleration is limited based oncertain criteria.

FIG. 22 provides an illustration that is useful for understanding howacceleration is limited when the desired acceleration varies across anobject interval.

FIG. 23 provides graphs that are useful for understanding howacceleration is limited when two object intervals overlap each other.

FIG. 24 provides a flow diagram of another method for controllingacceleration of a vehicle.

FIG. 25 provides a flow diagram of another method for controllingacceleration of a vehicle.

FIG. 26 provides an illustration that is useful for understanding avehicle's margin.

In the drawings, like reference numbers generally indicate identical orsimilar elements. Additionally, generally, the leftmost digit(s) of areference number identifies the drawing in which the reference numberfirst appears.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

As noted above, the acceleration of a vehicle may be limited duringoperation thereof. A desired longitudinal acceleration of the vehiclemay only be limited by moving objects that the vehicle is acting onlongitudinally. No information about lateral objects is used whendeciding how to limit the acceleration of the vehicle. This can causethe vehicle to accelerate uncomfortably when passing moving objects thatare nearby. The purpose of the present solution is to provide a methodwhich incorporates lateral object information in order to limit thelongitudinal acceleration of the vehicle. Doing so results in animproved ride quality when passing close by objects.

The present solution generally concerns implementing systems and methodsfor limiting acceleration of a vehicle when passing nearby movers toenhance ride quality. The methods involve obtaining sensor data andprocessing the sensor data to detect a lateral distance to an objectthat the vehicle is passing or is expected to pass when following thetrajectory. For example, a vehicle has a trajectory which passesobjects. The trajectory comprises a plurality of index points that areinterconnected. Each index point represents a future location of thevehicle following the trajectory. The computing device detects thelateral distance for each object by, for example: selecting oridentifying an index point of the vehicle trajectory that is alignedwith a center or center axis of the object; determining a distancebetween the index point and a closest edge of the object; andconsidering the distance as the lateral distance for the object. Thepresent solution is not limited to the particulars of this example.

Next, the system compares the lateral distance to a threshold value andselects whether acceleration limiting is to be performed by the vehiclebased on results of this comparison. If the lateral distance is greaterthan or equal to the threshold value, then the vehicle may travelwithout any acceleration limiting. If the lateral distance is less thanthe threshold value, then the vehicle may travel with accelerationlimiting.

In some scenarios, additional or alternative operations are performed toselect whether acceleration limiting should be performed by the vehicle.For example, the system may analyze the sensor data to: detect whetherthe object is stationary or moving; (if the object is stationary) detectwhether the stationary object is at least partially located outside of adrivable area for the vehicle (for example, a pedestrian sidewalk can bea non-drivable area outside of a drivable area such as a lane of a road)and at least partially located in a lane in which the vehicle istraveling; detect whether the stationary or moving object is inside thedrivable area of the vehicle but located at or proximate to an edge ofthe drivable area; and/or (if the object is moving) detect whether themoving object is at least partially biased in the lane in which thevehicle is traveling. The object may be proximate to the edge of thedrivable area when it is within a given distance therefrom (for example,0-M meters, where M is an integer equal to or greater than one).

Once the detection(s) is(are) made, the system may perform operations tolimit the amount of longitudinal acceleration that can be performed bythe vehicle. The acceleration limiting may occur when: the lateraldistance is less than the threshold distance; (if the object isstationary) the stationary object is at least partially located outsideof the drivable area of the vehicle and at least partially located inthe lane in which the vehicle is traveling; the stationary or movingobject is located inside the drivable area but located at or proximateto an edge of the drivable area abutting the lane in which the vehicle;and/or (if the object is moving) the moving object is at least partiallybiased in the lane in which the vehicle is traveling.

As used in this document, the singular forms “a,” “an,” and “the”include plural references unless the context clearly dictates otherwise.Unless defined otherwise, all technical and scientific terms used hereinhave the same meanings as commonly understood by one of ordinary skillsin the art. As used in this document, the term “comprising” means“including, but not limited to.” Definitions for additional terms thatare relevant to this document are included at the end of this DetailedDescription.

An “electronic device” or a “computing device” refers to a device thatincludes a processor and memory. Each device may have its own processorand/or memory, or the processor and/or memory may be shared with otherdevices as in a virtual machine or container arrangement. The memorywill contain or receive programming instructions that, when executed bythe processor, cause the electronic device to perform one or moreoperations according to the programming instructions.

The terms “memory,” “memory device,” “data store,” “data storagefacility” and the like each refer to a non-transitory device on whichcomputer-readable data, programming instructions or both are stored.Except where specifically stated otherwise, the terms “memory,” “memorydevice,” “data store,” “data storage facility” and the like are intendedto include single device embodiments, embodiments in which multiplememory devices together or collectively store a set of data orinstructions, as well as individual sectors within such devices.

The terms “processor” and “processing device” refer to a hardwarecomponent of an electronic device that is configured to executeprogramming instructions. Except where specifically stated otherwise,the singular term “processor” or “processing device” is intended toinclude both single-processing device embodiments and embodiments inwhich multiple processing devices together or collectively perform aprocess.

The term “vehicle” refers to any moving form of conveyance that iscapable of carrying either one or more human occupants and/or cargo andis powered by any form of energy. The term “vehicle” includes, but isnot limited to, cars, trucks, vans, trains, autonomous vehicles,semi-autonomous vehicles, manually operated vehicles, teleoperatedvehicles, watercraft, aircraft, aerial drones and the like. An“autonomous vehicle” (or “AV”) is a vehicle having a processor,programming instructions and drivetrain components that are controllableby the processor without requiring a human operator. An autonomousvehicle may be fully autonomous in that it does not require a humanoperator for most or all driving conditions and functions, or it may besemi-autonomous in that a human operator may be required in certainconditions or for certain operations, or that a human operator mayoverride the vehicle's autonomous system and may take control of thevehicle.

In this document, when terms such as “first” and “second” are used tomodify a noun, such use is simply intended to distinguish one item fromanother, and is not intended to require a sequential order unlessspecifically stated. In addition, terms of relative position such as“vertical” and “horizontal”, or “front” and “rear”, when used, areintended to be relative to each other and need not be absolute, and onlyrefer to one possible position of the device associated with those termsdepending on the device's orientation.

Notably, the present solution is being described herein in the contextof autonomous vehicles. However, the present solution is not limited toautonomous vehicle applications. The present solution can be used inother applications such as robotic application (for example to controlmovements of articulating arms) and/or system performance applications.

FIG. 1 illustrates an example system 100, in accordance with aspects ofthe disclosure. System 100 comprises a vehicle 102 which is caused totravel along a road in a semi-autonomous or autonomous manner. Vehicle102 is also referred to herein as an AV 102. The AV 102 can include, butis not limited to, land vehicles (as shown in FIG. 1 ), aircraft,watercraft, subterrenes, spacecraft, drones and/or an articulating arm(for example, with a gripper at a free end). As noted above, exceptwhere specifically noted this disclosure is not necessarily limited toAV embodiments, and it may include non-autonomous vehicles in someembodiments.

AV 102 is generally configured to detect objects 103, 114, 116 inproximity thereto. The objects can include, but are not limited to, avehicle 103, a cyclist 114 (such as a rider of a bicycle, electricscooter, motorcycle, or the like) and/or a pedestrian 116.

As illustrated in FIG. 1 , the AV 102 may include a sensor system 118,an on-board computing device 122, a communications interface 120, and auser interface 124. AV 102 may further include certain components (asillustrated, for example, in FIG. 2 ) included in vehicles, which may becontrolled by the on-board computing device 122 using a variety ofcommunication signals and/or commands, such as, for example,acceleration signals or commands, deceleration signals or commands,steering signals or commands, braking signals or commands, etc.

The sensor system 118 may include one or more sensors that are coupledto and/or are included within the AV 102, as illustrated in FIG. 2 . Forexample, such sensors may include, without limitation, a lidar system, aRADAR system, a laser detection and ranging (LADAR) system, a soundnavigation and ranging (SONAR) system, camera(s) (for example, visiblespectrum camera(s), infrared camera(s), etc.), temperature sensors,position sensors (for example, a global positioning system (GPS), etc.),location sensors, fuel sensors, motion sensors (for example, an inertialmeasurement unit (IMU), etc.), humidity sensors, occupancy sensors,and/or the like. The sensors are generally configured to generate sensordata. The sensor data can include information that describes thelocation of objects within the surrounding environment of the AV 102,information about the environment itself, information about the motionof the AV 102, information about a route of the vehicle, and/or thelike. As AV 102 travels over a surface (for example, a road), at leastsome of the sensors may collect data pertaining to the surface.

As will be described in greater detail, AV 102 may be configured with alidar system (for example, lidar system 264 of FIG. 2 ). The lidarsystem may be configured to transmit a light pulse 104 to detect objectslocated within a distance or range of distances of AV 102. Light pulse104 may be incident on one or more objects (for example, AV 103) and bereflected back to the lidar system. Reflected light pulse 106 incidenton the lidar system may be processed to determine a distance of thatobject to AV 102. The reflected light pulse 106 may be detected using,in some scenarios, a photodetector or array of photodetectors positionedand configured to receive the light reflected back into the lidarsystem. Lidar information, such as detected object data, is communicatedfrom the lidar system to the on-board computing device 122. The AV 102may also communicate lidar data to a remote computing device 110 (forexample, a cloud processing system) over a network 108. Computing device110 may be configured with one or more servers to process one or moreprocesses of the technology described herein. Computing device 110 mayalso be configured to communicate data/instructions to/from AV 102 overnetwork 108, to/from server(s) and/or database(s) 112.

It should be noted that the lidar systems for collecting data pertainingto the surface may be included in systems other than the AV 102 such as,without limitation, other vehicles (autonomous or driven), robots,satellites, etc.

Network 108 may include one or more wired or wireless networks. Forexample, the network 108 may include a cellular network (for example, along-term evolution (LTE) network, a code division multiple access(CDMA) network, a 3G network, a 4G network, a 5G network, another typeof next generation network, etc.). The network may also include a publicland mobile network (PLMN), a local area network (LAN), a wide areanetwork (WAN), a metropolitan area network (MAN), a telephone network(for example, the Public Switched Telephone Network (PSTN)), a privatenetwork, an ad hoc network, an intranet, the Internet, a fiberoptic-based network, a cloud computing network, and/or the like, and/ora combination of these or other types of networks.

AV 102 may retrieve, receive, display, and edit information generatedfrom a local application or delivered via network 108 from the database112. Database 112 may be configured to store and supply raw data,indexed data, structured data, map data, program instructions or otherconfigurations as is known.

The communications interface 120 may be configured to allowcommunication between AV 102 and external systems, such as, for example,external devices, sensors, other vehicles, servers, data stores,databases, etc. The communications interface 120 may utilize any now orhereafter known protocols, protection schemes, encodings, formats,packaging, etc. such as, without limitation, Wi-Fi, an infrared link,Bluetooth, etc. The user interface 124 may be part of peripheral devicesimplemented within the AV 102 including, for example, a keyboard, atouch screen display device, a microphone, and a speaker, etc. Thevehicle also may receive state information, descriptive information orother information about devices or objects in its environment via thecommunication interface 120 over communication links such as those knownas vehicle-to-vehicle, vehicle-to-object or other V2X communicationlinks. The term “V2X” refers to a communication between a vehicle andany object that the vehicle may encounter or affect in its environment.

As noted above, the AV 102 may detect objects 103, 114, 116 in proximitythereto. Such object detections are facilitated using the sensor datagenerated by the sensor system 118 (for example, lidar datasetsgenerated by an onboard lidar detector). The sensor data is processed bythe onboard computing device 122 of the AV 102 and/or by the remotecomputing device 110 to obtain one or more predicted trajectories forthe object given the sensor data. The predicted trajectories for theobject may then be used to generate a trajectory for the AV 102. The AV103 may then be caused by the on-board computing device to follow thetrajectory.

FIG. 2 illustrates a system architecture 200 for a vehicle, inaccordance with aspects of the disclosure. Vehicles 102 and/or 103 ofFIG. 1 can have the same or similar system architecture as that shown inFIG. 2 . Thus, the following discussion of system architecture 200 issufficient for understanding vehicle(s) 102, 103 of FIG. 1 . However,other types of vehicles are considered within the scope of thetechnology described herein and may contain more or less elements asdescribed in association with FIG. 2 . As a non-limiting example, anairborne vehicle may exclude brake or gear controllers, but may includean altitude sensor. In another non-limiting example, a water-basedvehicle may include a depth sensor. One skilled in the art willappreciate that other propulsion systems, sensors and controllers may beincluded based on a type of vehicle, as is known.

As shown in FIG. 2 , the system architecture 200 includes an engine ormotor 202 and various sensors 204-218 for measuring various parametersof the vehicle. In gas-powered or hybrid vehicles having a fuel-poweredengine, the sensors may include, for example, an engine temperaturesensor 204, a battery voltage sensor 206, an engine Revolutions PerMinute (RPM) sensor 208, and a throttle position sensor 210. If thevehicle is an electric or hybrid vehicle, then the vehicle may have anelectric motor, and accordingly will have sensors such as a batterymonitoring system 212 (to measure current, voltage and/or temperature ofthe battery), motor current 214 and voltage 216 sensors, and motorposition sensors 218 such as resolvers and encoders 218.

Operational parameter sensors that are common to both types of vehiclesinclude, for example: a position sensor 236 such as an accelerometer,gyroscope and/or inertial measurement unit; a speed sensor 238; and anodometer sensor 240. The vehicle also may have a clock 242 that thesystem uses to determine vehicle time during operation. The clock 242may be encoded into the vehicle on-board computing device 220, it may bea separate device, or multiple clocks may be available.

The vehicle also will include various sensors that operate to gatherinformation about the environment in which the vehicle is traveling.These sensors may include, for example: a location sensor 260 (forexample, a GPS device); object detection sensors such as one or morecameras 262; a lidar sensor system 264; and/or a RADAR and/or SONARsystem 266. The sensors also may include environmental sensors 268 suchas a precipitation sensor and/or ambient temperature sensor. The objectdetection sensors may enable the vehicle to detect objects that arewithin a given distance range of the vehicle in any direction, while theenvironmental sensors collect data about environmental conditions withinthe vehicle's area of travel.

During operations, information is communicated from the sensors to avehicle on-board computing device 220. The vehicle on-board computingdevice 220 may be implemented using the computer system of FIG. 4 . Thevehicle on-board computing device 220 analyzes the data captured by thesensors and optionally controls operations of the vehicle based onresults of the analysis. For example, the vehicle on-board computingdevice 220 may control: braking via a brake controller 222; directionvia a steering controller 224; speed and acceleration via a throttlecontroller 226 (in a gas-powered vehicle) or a motor speed controller228 (such as a current level controller in an electric vehicle); adifferential gear controller 230 (in vehicles with transmissions);and/or other controllers. Auxiliary device controller 254 may beconfigured to control one or more auxiliary devices, such as testingsystems, auxiliary sensors, mobile devices transported by the vehicle,etc.

Geographic location information may be communicated from the locationsensor 260 to the vehicle on-board computing device 220, which may thenaccess a map of the environment that corresponds to the locationinformation to determine known fixed features of the environment such asstreets, buildings, stop signs and/or stop/go signals. Captured imagesfrom the cameras 262 and/or object detection information captured fromsensors such as lidar system 264 is communicated from those sensors tothe vehicle on-board computing device 220. The object detectioninformation and/or captured images are processed by the vehicle on-boardcomputing device 220 to detect objects in proximity to the vehicle. Anyknown or to be known technique for making an object detection based onsensor data and/or captured images can be used in the embodimentsdisclosed in this document.

Lidar information is communicated from lidar system 264 to the vehicleon-board computing device 220. Additionally, captured images arecommunicated from the camera(s) 262 to the vehicle on-board computingdevice 220. The lidar information and/or captured images are processedby the vehicle on-board computing device 220 to detect objects inproximity to the vehicle. The manner in which the object detections aremade by the vehicle on-board computing device 220 includes suchcapabilities detailed in this disclosure.

In addition, the system architecture 200 may include an onboard displaydevice 270 that may generate and output an interface on which sensordata, vehicle status information, or outputs generated by the processesdescribed in this document are displayed to an occupant of the vehicle.The display device may include, or a separate device may be, an audiospeaker that presents such information in audio format.

The vehicle on-board computing device 220 may include and/or may be incommunication with a routing controller 232 that generates a navigationroute from a start position to a destination position for an autonomousvehicle. The routing controller 232 may access a map data store toidentify possible routes and road segments that a vehicle can travel onto get from the start position to the destination position. The routingcontroller 232 may score the possible routes and identify a preferredroute to reach the destination. For example, the routing controller 232may generate a navigation route that minimizes Euclidean distancetraveled or other cost function during the route, and may further accessthe traffic information and/or estimates that can affect an amount oftime it will take to travel on a particular route. Depending onimplementation, the routing controller 232 may generate one or moreroutes using various routing methods, such as Dijkstra's algorithm,Bellman-Ford algorithm, or other algorithms. The routing controller 232may also use the traffic information to generate a navigation route thatreflects expected conditions of the route (for example, current day ofthe week or current time of day, etc.), such that a route generated fortravel during rush-hour may differ from a route generated for travellate at night. The routing controller 232 may also generate more thanone navigation route to a destination and send more than one of thesenavigation routes to a user for selection by the user from among variouspossible routes.

In some scenarios, the vehicle on-board computing device 220 maydetermine perception information of the surrounding environment of thevehicle. Based on the sensor data provided by one or more sensors andlocation information that is obtained, the vehicle on-board computingdevice 220 may determine perception information of the surroundingenvironment of the vehicle. The perception information may representwhat an ordinary driver would perceive in the surrounding environment ofa vehicle. The perception data may include information relating to oneor more objects in the environment of the vehicle. For example, thevehicle on-board computing device 220 may process sensor data (forexample, lidar data, RADAR data, camera images, etc.) in order toidentify objects and/or features in the environment of vehicle. Theobjects may include, but is not limited to, traffic signals, roadwayboundaries, other vehicles, pedestrians, and/or obstacles. The vehicleon-board computing device 220 may use any now or hereafter known objectrecognition algorithms, video tracking algorithms, and computer visionalgorithms (for example, track objects frame-to-frame iteratively over anumber of time periods) to determine the perception.

In those or other scenarios, the vehicle on-board computing device 220may also determine, for one or more identified objects in theenvironment, the current state of the object. The state information mayinclude, without limitation, for each object: a current location; acurrent speed; an acceleration; a current heading; a current pose; acurrent shape, size and/or footprint; an object type or classification(for example, vehicle. pedestrian, bicycle, static object, or obstacle);and/or other state information.

The vehicle on-board computing device 220 may perform one or moreprediction and/or forecasting operations. For example, the vehicleon-board computing device 220 may predict future locations,trajectories, and/or actions of one or more objects. For example, thevehicle on-board computing device 220 may predict the future locations,trajectories, and/or actions of the objects based at least in part onperception information (for example, the state data for each objectcomprising an estimated shape and pose determined as discussed below),location information, sensor data, and/or any other data that describesthe past and/or current state of the objects, the vehicle, thesurrounding environment, and/or their relationship(s). For example, ifan object is a vehicle and the current driving environment includes anintersection, the vehicle on-board computing device 220 may predictwhether the object will likely move straight forward or make a turn. Ifthe perception data indicates that the intersection has no trafficlight, the vehicle on-board computing device 220 may also predictwhether the vehicle may have to fully stop prior to entering theintersection.

In those or other scenarios, the vehicle on-board computing device 220may determine a motion plan for the vehicle. For example, the vehicleon-board computing device 220 may determine a motion plan for thevehicle based on the perception data and/or the prediction data.Specifically, given predictions about the future locations of proximateobjects and other perception data, the vehicle on-board computing device220 can determine a motion plan for the vehicle that best navigates thevehicle relative to the objects at their future locations.

In those or other scenarios, the vehicle on-board computing device 220may receive predictions and make a decision regarding how to handleobjects and/or actors in the environment of the vehicle. For example,for a particular actor (for example, a vehicle with a given speed,direction, turning angle, etc.), the vehicle on-board computing device220 decides whether to overtake, yield, stop, and/or pass based on, forexample, traffic conditions, map data, state of the autonomous vehicle,etc. Furthermore, the vehicle on-board computing device 220 also plans apath for the vehicle to travel on a given route, as well as drivingparameters (for example, distance, speed, and/or turning angle). Thatis, for a given object, the vehicle on-board computing device 220decides what to do with the object and determines how to do it. Forexample, for a given object, the vehicle on-board computing device 220may decide to pass the object and may determine whether to pass on theleft side or right side of the object (including motion parameters suchas speed). The vehicle on-board computing device 220 may also assess therisk of a collision between a detected object and the vehicle. If therisk exceeds an acceptable threshold, it may determine whether thecollision can be avoided if the vehicle follows a defined vehicletrajectory and/or implements one or more dynamically generated emergencymaneuvers in a time period (for example, N milliseconds). If thecollision can be avoided, then the vehicle on-board computing device 220may execute one or more control instructions to perform a cautiousmaneuver (for example, mildly slow down, accelerate, change lane, orswerve). In contrast, if the collision cannot be avoided, then thevehicle on-board computing device 220 may execute one or more controlinstructions for execution of an emergency maneuver (for example, brakeand/or change direction of travel).

As discussed above, planning and control data regarding the movement ofthe vehicle is generated for execution. The vehicle on-board computingdevice 220 may, for example: control braking via a brake controller;direction via a steering controller; speed and acceleration via athrottle controller (in a gas-powered vehicle) or a motor speedcontroller (such as a current level controller in an electric vehicle);change gears via a differential gear controller (in vehicles withtransmissions); and/or control other operations via other controllers.

The present solution can be implemented, for example, using one or morecomputer systems, such as computer system 300 shown in FIG. 3 . Computersystem 300 can be any computer capable of performing the functionsdescribed herein. The on-board computing device 122 of FIG. 1 ,computing device 110 of FIG. 1 , robotic device(s) 152 of FIG. 1 ,mobile communication device(s) 156 of FIG. 1 , and/or the vehicleon-board computing device 220 of FIG. 2 may be the same as or similar tocomputing system 300. As such, the discussion of computing system 300 issufficient for understanding the devices 110, 122, 152, 156 and 220 ofFIGS. 1-2 .

Computing system 300 may include more or less components than thoseshown in FIG. 3 . However, the components shown are sufficient todisclose an illustrative solution implementing the present solution. Thehardware architecture of FIG. 3 represents one implementation of arepresentative computing system configured to operate a vehicle, asdescribed herein. As such, the computing system 300 of FIG. 3 implementsat least a portion of the method(s) described herein.

Some or all components of the computing system 300 can be implemented ashardware, software and/or a combination of hardware and software. Thehardware includes, but is not limited to, one or more electroniccircuits. The electronic circuits can include, but are not limited to,passive components (for example, resistors and capacitors) and/or activecomponents (for example, amplifiers and/or microprocessors). The passiveand/or active components can be adapted to, arranged to and/orprogrammed to perform one or more of the methodologies, procedures, orfunctions described herein.

Computer system 300 includes one or more processors (also called centralprocessing units, or CPUs), such as a processor 304. Processor 304 isconnected to a communication infrastructure or bus 302. One or moreprocessors 304 may each be a graphics processing unit (GPU). In somescenarios, a GPU is a processor that is a specialized electronic circuitdesigned to process mathematically intensive applications. The GPU mayhave a parallel structure that is efficient for parallel processing oflarge blocks of data, such as mathematically intensive data common tocomputer graphics applications, images, videos, etc.

Computer system 300 also includes user input/output device(s) 316, suchas monitors, keyboards, pointing devices, etc., that communicate withcommunication infrastructure 302 through user input/output interface(s)308. Computer system 300 further includes a main or primary memory 306,such as random access memory (RAM). Main memory 306 may include one ormore levels of cache. Main memory 306 has stored therein control logic(i.e., computer software) and/or data.

One or more secondary storage devices or memories 310 may be providedwith computer system 300. Secondary memory 310 may include, for example,a hard disk drive 312 and/or a removable storage device or drive 314.Removable storage drive 314 may be an external hard drive, a universalserial bus (USB) drive, a memory card such as a compact flash card orsecure digital memory, a floppy disk drive, a magnetic tape drive, acompact disc drive, an optical storage device, a tape backup device,and/or any other storage device/drive.

Removable storage drive 314 may interact with a removable storage unit318. Removable storage unit 318 includes a computer usable or readablestorage device having stored thereon computer software (control logic)and/or data. Removable storage unit 318 may be an external hard drive, auniversal serial bus (USB) drive, a memory card such as a compact flashcard or secure digital memory, a floppy disk, a magnetic tape, a compactdisc, a DVD, an optical storage disk, and/or any other computer datastorage device. Removable storage drive 314 reads from and/or writes toremovable storage unit 314 in a well-known manner.

In some scenarios, secondary memory 310 may include other means,instrumentalities or other approaches for allowing computer programsand/or other instructions and/or data to be accessed by computer system300. Such means, instrumentalities or other approaches may include, forexample, a removable storage unit 322 and an interface 320. Examples ofthe removable storage unit 322 and the interface 320 may include aprogram cartridge and cartridge interface (such as that found in videogame devices), a removable memory chip (such as an EPROM or PROM) andassociated socket, a memory stick and USB port, a memory card andassociated memory card slot, and/or any other removable storage unit andassociated interface.

Computer system 300 may further include a communication or networkinterface 324. Communication interface 324 enables computer system 300to communicate and interact with any combination of remote devices,remote networks, remote entities, etc. (individually and collectivelyreferenced by reference number 328). For example, communicationinterface 324 may allow computer system 300 to communicate with remotedevices 328 over communications path 326, which may be wired and/orwireless, and which may include any combination of LANs, WANs, theInternet, etc. Control logic and/or data may be transmitted to and fromcomputer system 300 via communication path 326.

In some scenarios, a tangible, non-transitory apparatus or article ofmanufacture comprising a tangible, non-transitory computer useable orreadable medium having control logic (software) stored thereon is alsoreferred to herein as a computer program product or program storagedevice. This includes, but is not limited to, computer system 300, mainmemory 306, secondary memory 310, and removable storage units 318 and322, as well as tangible articles of manufacture embodying anycombination of the foregoing. Such control logic, when executed by oneor more data processing devices (such as computer system 300), causessuch data processing devices to operate as described herein.

Based on the teachings contained in this disclosure, it will be apparentto persons skilled in the relevant art(s) how to make and use thepresent solution using data processing devices, computer systems and/orcomputer architectures other than that shown in FIG. 3 . In particular,the present solution can operate with software, hardware, and/oroperating system implementations other than those described herein.

FIG. 4 provides a block diagram that is useful for understanding howmotion or movement of an AV is achieved in accordance with the presentsolution. All of the operations performed in blocks 402-412 can beperformed by the on-board computing device (for example, on-boardcomputing device 122 of FIG. 1 and/or 220 of FIG. 2 ) of a vehicle (forexample, AV 102 of FIG. 1 ).

In block 402, a location of the AV (for example, AV 102 of FIG. 1 ) isdetected. This detection can be made based on sensor data output from alocation sensor (for example, location sensor 260 of FIG. 2 ) of the AV.This sensor data can include, but is not limited to, GPS data. Thedetected location of the AV is then passed to block 406.

In block 404, an object (for example, vehicle 103 of FIG. 1 ) isdetected within proximity of the AV (for example, <100+ meters). Thisdetection is made based on sensor data output from a camera (forexample, camera 262 of FIG. 2 ) of the AV and/or a lidar system (forexample, lidar system 264 of FIG. 2 ) of the AV. For example, imageprocessing is performed to detect an instance of an object of a certainclass (for example, a vehicle, cyclist or pedestrian) in an image. Theimage processing/object detection can be achieved in accordance with anyknown or to be known image processing/object detection algorithm.

Additionally, a predicted trajectory is determined in block 404 for theobject. The object's trajectory is predicted in block 404 based on theobject's class, cuboid geometry(ies), cuboid heading(s) and/or contentsof a map 418 (for example, sidewalk locations, lane locations, lanedirections of travel, driving rules, etc.). The manner in which thecuboid geometry(ies) and heading(s) are determined will become evidentas the discussion progresses. At this time, it should be noted that thecuboid geometry(ies) and/or heading(s) are determined using sensor dataof various types (for example, 2D images, 3D lidar point clouds) and avector map 418 (for example, lane geometries). Techniques for predictingobject trajectories based on cuboid geometries and headings may include,for example, predicting that the object is moving on a linear path inthe same direction as the heading direction of a cuboid. The predictedobject trajectories can include, but are not limited to, the followingtrajectories: a trajectory defined by the object's actual speed (forexample, 1 mile per hour) and actual direction of travel (for example,west); a trajectory defined by the object's actual speed (for example, 1mile per hour) and another possible direction of travel (for example,south, south-west, or X (for example, 40°) degrees from the object'sactual direction of travel in a direction towards the AV) for theobject; a trajectory defined by another possible speed for the object(for example, 2-10 miles per hour) and the object's actual direction oftravel (for example, west); and/or a trajectory defined by anotherpossible speed for the object (for example, 2-10 miles per hour) andanother possible direction of travel (for example, south, south-west, orX (for example, 40°) degrees from the object's actual direction oftravel in a direction towards the AV) for the object. The possiblespeed(s) and/or possible direction(s) of travel may be pre-defined forobjects in the same class and/or sub-class as the object. It should benoted once again that the cuboid defines a full extent of the object anda heading of the object. The heading defines a direction in which theobject's front is pointed, and therefore provides an indication as tothe actual and/or possible direction of travel for the object.

Information 420 specifying the object's predicted trajectory, the cuboidgeometry(ies)/heading(s) is provided to block 406. In some scenarios, aclassification of the object is also passed to block 406. In block 406,a vehicle trajectory is generated using the information from blocks 402and 404. Techniques for determining a vehicle trajectory using cuboidsmay include, for example, determining a trajectory for the AV that wouldpass the object when the object is in front of the AV, the cuboid has aheading direction that is aligned with the direction in which the AV ismoving, and the cuboid has a length that is greater than a thresholdvalue. The present solution is not limited to the particulars of thisscenario. The vehicle trajectory 420 can be determined based on thelocation information from block 402, the object detection informationfrom block 404, and/or map information 414 (which is pre-stored in adata store of the vehicle). The map information 414 may include, but isnot limited to, all or a portion of road map(s) 160 of FIG. 1 . Thevehicle trajectory 420 may represent a smooth path that does not haveabrupt changes that would otherwise provide passenger discomfort. Forexample, the vehicle trajectory is defined by a path of travel along agiven lane of a road in which the object is not predicted to travelwithin a given amount of time. The vehicle trajectory 420 is thenprovided to block 408.

In block 408, a steering angle and velocity command is generated basedon the vehicle trajectory 420. The steering angle and velocity commandare provided to block 410 for vehicle dynamics control, i.e., thesteering angle and velocity command causes the AV to follow the vehicletrajectory 408.

FIG. 5 provides a flow diagram of an illustrative method 500 forselectively controlling longitudinal acceleration of a vehicle (forexample, vehicle 102 of FIG. 1 ). Method 500 can be performed at leastpartially by an on-board computing device (for example, on-boardcomputing device 122 of FIG. 1 and/or vehicle on-board computing device220 of FIG. 2 ) of the vehicle and/or another computing device (forexample, server 110 of FIG. 1 and/or computer system 300 of FIG. 3 ).

Method 500 begins with 502 and continues with 504 where the computingdevice obtains sensor data. The sensor data can include data generatedby one or more sensors (for example, sensor system 118 of FIG. 1 and/orsensor(s) 236-242, 260-268 of FIG. 2 ) of the vehicle. The sensor datais processed by the computing device in 506 to detect a lateral distancebetween an index point on the vehicle's trajectory and an object thatthe vehicle is passing. For example, as shown in FIG. 6 , a vehicle 608has a trajectory 606 which passes objects 604, 610. The trajectory 606comprises a plurality of index points that are interconnected. Thecomputing device detects the lateral distance D_(object-trajectory) foreach object 604, 610 by, for example: identifying an index point 612 ofthe vehicle trajectory that is aligned with a center 614 or Center ofGravity (CoG) of the object; determining a smallest distance between theindex point 612 and a closest edge 616 of the object; and consideringthe distance as the lateral distance for the object. The presentsolution is not limited to the particulars of this example. FIG. 7 showsa scenario in which the lateral distance associated with objects 704,710 is greater than the lateral distance associated with object 604, 610of FIG. 6 .

In 508, the lateral distance is compared to a threshold value thr. Thethreshold value thr may be pre-defined and/or selected from a pluralityof threshold values based on the type of object and/or other criteria(for example, vehicle speed, etc.). The threshold value(s) may be storedin a Look Up Table (LUT) format or other format in a memory (forexample, memory 306 and/or 310 of FIG. 3 ) of the computing device. Forexample, the threshold value(s) may be any number (integer or decimal)equal to or greater than zero and less than or equal to five, ten,fifteen, twenty or twenty-five. The present solution is not limited inthis regard.

When the lateral distance is less than the threshold value [508:YES],method 500 continues with 510 where the vehicle is caused to continueautonomous driving operations with acceleration limiting. The autonomousdriving operations can include, but not limited to, following apreviously published path and/or trajectory via steering, acceleration,and/or braking as discussed above in relation to FIG. 4 . The manner inwhich the acceleration limiting is achieved will become evident as thediscussion progresses. The amount of acceleration limiting may be thesame or different for various scenarios as will be described below. Thisscenario is shown in FIG. 6 where the lateral distanceD_(object-trajectory) is less than the threshold value thr.

In contrast, when the lateral distance is greater than or equal to thethreshold value [508:NO], method 500 continues with 512 where thevehicle is caused to continue autonomous driving operations without anyacceleration limiting. The autonomous driving operations can include,but not limited to, following a previously published path and/ortrajectory via steering, acceleration, and/or braking as discussed abovein relation to FIG. 4 . This scenario is shown in FIG. 7 where thelateral distance D_(object-trajectory) is greater than the thresholdvalue thr.

Subsequently, 514 is performed where method 500 ends or other operationsare performed. For example, method 500 could return to 504 so thatanother iteration thereof is performed using new or updated sensor data.

FIG. 8 provides a flow diagram of another method 800 for selectivelycontrolling longitudinal acceleration of a vehicle (for example, vehicle102 of FIG. 1 ). Method 800 can be performed at least partially by anon-board computing device (for example, on-board computing device 122 ofFIG. 1 and/or vehicle on-board computing device 220 of FIG. 2 ) of thevehicle and/or another computing device (for example, server 110 of FIG.1 and/or computer system 300 of FIG. 3 ).

Method 800 begins with 802 and continues with 804-808, 818. Theoperations of these blocks are the same as or similar to those of blocks504-508, 512 of FIG. 5 . The difference between methods 500 and 800 isthat in method 800 additional operations are performed when the lateraldistance is less than the threshold value. The additional operationsinclude analyzing the sensor data to determine whether the object isfully inside a non-drivable area as shown by decision block 812. Anon-drivable area comprises an area in which the vehicle is notauthorized or is unable to drive. Such an area can include, but is notlimited to, sidewalk(s) and/or green space(s). The non-drivable area maybe located adjacent to and/or abut a drivable area. The drivable areacomprises an area in which the vehicle is authorized or is able todrive. Such an area can include, but is not limited to, road(s),lane(s), driveway(s) and parking lot(s).

When the object is at least partially outside of the non-drivable area[812:NO], the computing device further analyzes the sensor data in 814to determine whether the object is at least partially in the vehicle'slane. If not [814:NO], then method 800 continues with 818 where thevehicle is caused to continue autonomous driving operations without anyacceleration limiting. If so [814:YES], then method 800 continues with820 where the vehicle is caused to continue with autonomous drivingoperations with acceleration limiting. The manner in which theacceleration limiting is achieved will become evident as the discussionprogresses. The amount of acceleration limiting may be the same ordifferent for various scenarios as will be described below. Subsequentto completing 818 or 820, method 800 continues with 822 where method 800ends or other operations are performed (for example, returns to 804).

When the object is at least partially outside of the non-drivable area[812:YES], the computing device further analyzes the sensor data in 816to determine whether the object is at or proximate to an edge of thevehicle's lane. If not [816:NO], then method 800 continues with 818where the vehicle is caused to continue autonomous driving operationswithout any acceleration limiting. If so [816:YES], then method 800continues with 820 where the vehicle is caused to continue withautonomous driving operations with acceleration limiting. The manner inwhich the acceleration limiting is achieved will become evident as thediscussion progresses. The amount of acceleration limiting may be thesame or different for various scenarios as will be described below.Subsequent to completing 818 or 820, method 800 continues with 822 wheremethod 800 ends or other operations are performed (for example, returnsto 804).

FIG. 9 provides an illustration that is useful for understanding whenacceleration limiting is not needed in accordance with method 800. Asshown in FIG. 9 , a vehicle 908 is following a trajectory 906 through adrivable area 900 (for example, a lane of a road). In effect, thevehicle 908 is going to pass an object 904 which is entirely locatedwithin a non-drivable area 902. In this case, the computing devicedetermines that acceleration limiting is not needed even though thelateral distance associated with the object is less than the thresholdvalue (i.e., D_(object-trajectory)<thr). The present solution is notlimited to the particulars of FIG. 9 .

FIG. 10 provides another illustration that is useful for understandingwhen acceleration limiting is not needed in accordance with method 800.As shown in FIG. 10 , a vehicle 1008 is following a trajectory 1006through a drivable area 1000 (for example, a lane of a road). In effect,the vehicle 1008 is going to pass an object 1004. Object 1004 isentirely located within a non-drivable area 1002 but resides at an edge1010 of the non-drivable area abutting the vehicle's lane. In this case,the computing device determines that acceleration limiting is neededeven though the object is entirely located within the non-drivable area1002. The present solution is not limited to the particulars of FIG. 10.

FIG. 11 provides another illustration that is useful for understandingwhen acceleration limiting is not needed in accordance with method 800.As shown in FIG. 11 , a vehicle 1108 is following a trajectory 1106through a drivable area 1100 (for example, a lane of a road). In effect,the vehicle 1108 is going to pass an object 1104. Object 1104 ispartially located outside of a non-drivable area 1102 and partiallyinside the drivable area 1100. In this case, the computing devicedetermines that acceleration limiting is needed. The amount by which thevehicle's acceleration is limited here is different than (for example,more than) the amount by which the vehicle's acceleration is limited inthe scenario of FIG. 10 . In effect, the vehicle's acceleration in FIG.11 may be different than (for example, smaller than) the vehicle'sacceleration in FIG. 10 . The present solution is not limited to theparticulars of FIG. 11 .

Referring now to FIG. 12 , there is provided a flow diagram of anothermethod 1200 for selectively controlling longitudinal acceleration of avehicle (for example, vehicle 102 of FIG. 1 ). Method 1200 can beperformed at least partially by an on-board computing device (forexample, on-board computing device 122 of FIG. 1 and/or vehicle on-boardcomputing device 220 of FIG. 2 ) of the vehicle and/or another computingdevice (for example, server 110 of FIG. 1 and/or computer system 300 ofFIG. 3 ).

Method 1200 begins with 1202 and continues with 1204-1208, 1216. Theoperations of these blocks are the same as or similar to those of blocks504-508, 512 of FIG. 5 . The difference between methods 500 and 1200 isthat in method 1200 additional operations are performed when the lateraldistance is less than the threshold value. The additional operationsinclude analyzing the sensor data to determine whether the object ismoving or stationary as shown by decision block 1210. When the object isstationary [1210:NO], the operations of blocks 812-822 of FIG. 8 may beperformed as shown by block 1212.

When the object is moving [1210:YES], computing device further analyzesthe sensor data to determine whether the moving object is biased in thevehicle's lane as shown by 1214. If not [1214:NO], then method 1200continues with 1216 where the vehicle is caused to continue withautonomous vehicle driving operations without any acceleration limiting.If so [1214:YES], then method 1200 continues with 1211 where the vehicleis caused to continue with autonomous vehicle driving operations withacceleration limiting. The manner in which acceleration limiting isachieved will become more evident as the discussion progresses.Subsequent to completing 1216 or 1218, 1220 is performed where method1200 ends or other operations are performed (for example, returns to1204).

Referring now to FIG. 13 , there is provided an illustration that isuseful for understanding when acceleration limiting is not needed inaccordance with method 1200. As shown in FIG. 13 , a vehicle 1312 isfollowing a trajectory 1306 through a drivable area 1300 (for example, amulti-lane road). The vehicle 1312 is going to pass an object 1304 whichis entirely located within the drivable area 1300. The lateral distanceassociated with object 1304 is less than the threshold value. The object1304 is moving in a lane 1310 which is adjacent to the lane 1308 inwhich the vehicle 1312 is traveling. The object 1304 and vehicle 1312are traveling the same direction as shown by arrows 1314, 1316. In thiscase, the computing device determines that acceleration limiting is notneeded even though the lateral distance associated with the object isless than the threshold value (i.e., D_(object-trajectory)<thr). Thepresent solution is not limited to the particulars of FIG. 13 .

Referring now to FIG. 14 , there is provided an illustration that isuseful for understanding when acceleration limiting is not needed inaccordance with method 1200. As shown in FIG. 14 , a vehicle 1412 isfollowing a trajectory 1406 through a drivable area 1400 (for example, amulti-lane road). The vehicle 1412 is going to pass an object 1404 whichis entirely located within the drivable area 1400. The lateral distanceassociated with object 1404 is less than the threshold value. The object1404 is moving in a lane 1410 which is adjacent to the lane 1408 inwhich the vehicle 1412 is traveling. The object 1404 and vehicle 1412are traveling in opposite directions as shown by arrows 1414, 1416. Inthis case, the computing device determines that acceleration limiting isnot needed even though the lateral distance associated with the objectis less than the threshold value (i.e., D_(object-trajectory)<thr). Thepresent solution is not limited to the particulars of FIG. 14 .

Referring now to FIG. 15 , there is provided an illustration that isuseful for understanding when acceleration limiting is not needed inaccordance with method 1200. As shown in FIG. 15 , a vehicle 1512 isfollowing a trajectory 1506 through a drivable area 1500 (for example, amulti-lane road). The vehicle 1512 is going to pass an object 1504 whichis entirely located within the drivable area 1500. The lateral distanceassociated with object 1504 is less than the threshold value. The object1504 is moving in a lane 1510 which is adjacent to the lane 1508 inwhich the vehicle 1512 is traveling. The object 1504 and vehicle 1512are traveling in opposite directions as shown by arrows 1514, 1516. Theobject 1504 is biased into the vehicle's lane 1508. In this case, thecomputing device determines that acceleration limiting is needed. Thepresent solution is not limited to the particulars of FIG. 14 .

FIG. 16 provides a flow diagram of a method 1600 for determining anamount by which a vehicle's acceleration is limited. Another such method1900 will be described below in relation to FIG. 19 . Methods 1600, 1900can be performed in blocks 510 of FIG. 5, 820 of FIG. 8 and/or 1218 ofFIG. 12 .

As shown in FIG. 16 , method 1600 begins with 1602 and continues with1604 where the computing device defines interval(s) in which thevehicle's acceleration is to be limited. The interval is also referredto herein as an acceleration limiting interval. The accelerationlimiting interval can have a predefined length with each opposing end agiven distance from the object's center and/or respective corner. Forexample, as shown in FIG. 17 , an interval 1708 has a length L, a firstend 1704 located a distance d1 from a location of a vehicle's margin1722, and a second end 1706 located a distance d2 from the vehicle'smargin 1722, a distance d3 from a first corner 1732 of the object, and adistance d4 from a second opposing corner 1734 of the object. Distancesd1 and d2 are the same. An illustration is provided in FIG. 26 that isuseful for understanding the location of the vehicle's margin. Thevehicle's margin is a sequence of points that are determined by: slidinga footprint 2600 of the vehicle longitudinally along the trajectory2602; (for each index point of the trajectory) sliding the footprint2600 laterally until the footprint intersects with the object 2604; anddefining the vehicle's margin 2606 by a line comprising points 2608,where each point represents a vehicle center or center of gravity at alaterally slid location. Distances d1 and d2 are then determined basedon the vehicle's margin. The present solution is not limited to theparticulars of FIG. 17 and/or FIG. 26 .

After 1606, the computing device processes sensor data to determine adistance between the object and each index point of the vehicle'strajectory within the interval. For example, as shown in FIG. 17 , avehicle 1726 is following a trajectory 1724 in a drivable area 1710. Thetrajectory 1724 comprises a plurality of interconnected index points1702 ₁, . . . , 1702 ₁₁. The computing device determines a distanceD_(object-trajectory) for each index 1702 ₂, . . . , 1702 ₁₀ within theinterval 1708. The present solution is not limited to the particulars ofFIG. 17 .

Next in 1608, a desired acceleration is determined for the vehicle ateach index point in the interval based on the distance. For example,with reference to FIG. 17 , the distance D_(object-trajectory)associated with index point 17024 is used to obtain a desiredacceleration value A_(desired) from a stored LUT(s) or configurationfile(s). The present solution is not limited in this regard. In somescenarios, each object type will have a set of configuration files thatmay be used to determine the desired acceleration for the vehicle. Forexample, if an object is associated with a pedestrian presence, then thepedestrian presence configuration file is used to obtain the desiredacceleration values). The pedestrian presence probability may be used tointerpolate between the pedestrian presence parameters versus the objectparameters. If an object is associated with a cyclist presence, then thecyclist presence configuration file is used to obtain the desiredacceleration values). The cyclist presence probability may be used tointerpolate between the cyclist presence parameters versus the objectparameters. The present solution is not limited to the particulars ofthis example.

Next, the computing device performs operations in 1614 to determinewhether a single object is at issue. If so [1614:YES], then 1616 isperformed where the computing device selects the smallest final desiredacceleration value (for example, A_(desired-2), whereA_(desired-2)<A_(desired-1), A_(desired-3), . . . , and A_(desired-N))for limiting the vehicle's acceleration over an entire interval (forexample, interval 1708 of FIG. 17 ). The selected desired accelerationvalue may be optionally adjusted in 1622 based on the class of theobject. For example, the acceleration value is reduced by a firstpre-defined amount (for example, by 0-10%) when the object is classifiedas a pedestrian and reduced by a second different pre-defined amount(for example, by 10-30%) when the object is classified as a cyclist. Thepresent solution is not limited to the particulars of this example. Theacceleration value may alternatively be decreased based on the object'sclassification. A weight may be selected in 1623 based on apredetermined calibration weight stored in a configuration file. Theweight can be, for example, an integer or decimal number between zeroand one hundred. The selected desired acceleration value is then used in1624 to limit the vehicle's acceleration over the interval associatedwith the object at issue (for example, object 1712 of FIG. 17 ).Subsequently, 1626 is performed where method 1600 ends or otheroperations are performed.

When there are two or more objects at issue [1614:NO], then thecomputing device selects the smallest final desired acceleration for allobjects at each index point in the intervals, as shown by 1618. In 1620,the computing device uses a refining algorithm to generate resultantacceleration values using the selected final desired accelerations. Therefining algorithm can include, but is not limited to, a machinelearning algorithm that is trained to generate resultant accelerationvalues based on context information derived from sensor data. Thecontext information can include, but is not limited to, relativelocations of vehicle and objects, position of vehicle, position ofobject, vehicle trajectory, predicted object trajectory, objectclassification, direction of travel for the vehicle, and/or direction oftravel for the object. The resultant acceleration values may beoptionally adjusted in 1622 based on the class of the object. Forexample, a resultant acceleration value is reduced by a firstpre-defined amount (for example, 0-10%) when the object is classified asa pedestrian and reduced by a second different pre-defined amount (forexample, 1-30%) when the object is classified as a cyclist. The presentsolution is not limited to the particulars of this example. Theacceleration value may alternatively be increased based on the object'sclassification. The selected final desired acceleration value is thenused in 1624 to limit the vehicle's acceleration over the intervalassociated with the object at issue (for example, object 1712 of FIG. 17). Subsequently, 1626 is performed where method 1600 ends or otheroperations are performed.

FIG. 18 provides graphs that are useful for understanding how avehicle's acceleration may be limited in accordance with method 1600 ofFIG. 16 . More specifically, graph 1800 illustrates how much to limit avehicle's acceleration based on lateral distance D_(object-trajectory).Graph 1802 illustrates how much to limit a vehicle's acceleration basedon edge distance D_(object-edge).

FIG. 19 provides a flow diagram of another method 1900 for determiningan amount by which a vehicle's acceleration is limited. Method 1900 canbe performed in blocks 510 of FIG. 5, 820 of FIG. 8 and/or 1218 of FIG.12 .

As shown in FIG. 19 , method 1900 begins with 1902 and continues with1904 where the computing device defines interval(s) in which thevehicle's acceleration is to be limited. The interval is also referredto herein as an acceleration limiting interval. The accelerationlimiting interval can have a predefined length with each opposing end agiven distance from the object's center and/or respective corner. Forexample, as shown in FIG. 17 , an interval 1708 has a length L, a firstend 1704 located a distance d1 from the vehicle's margin 1722, and asecond end 1706 located a distance d2 from the vehicle's margin 1722, adistance d3 from a first corner 1732 of the object, and a distance d4from a second opposing corner 1734 of the object. Distances d1 and d2are the same. The present solution is not limited to the particulars ofFIG. 17 . Another interval 2010 is shown in FIG. 20 .

In 1906, the computing device processes sensor data to determine a firstdistance between the vehicle's margin when adjacent to the object andeach index point on the vehicle's trajectory within the interval. Forexample, with reference to FIG. 20 , the computing device determines thelocation of the vehicle's margin 2008 if the vehicle is adjacent to theobject 2004. The vehicle's margin 2008 is a sequence of points that aredetermined by: sliding a footprint of the vehicle longitudinally alongthe trajectory; (for each index point of the trajectory) sliding thefootprint laterally until the footprint intersects with the object; anddefine the vehicle's margin by a line comprising points, where eachpoint represents a vehicle center or center of gravity at a laterallyslid location. The distance D_(vehicle-trajectory) is then determinedbetween this location of the vehicle's margin 2008 and an index point2012 of the vehicle's trajectory 2006. The present solution is notlimited to the particulars of FIG. 20 .

In 1908, the computing device processes sensor data to determine asecond distance between the vehicle's margin when adjacent to the objectand an edge of a drivable area. For example, with reference to FIG. 20 ,the computing device determines a distance D_(vehicle-edge) between thelocation of the vehicle's margin 2008 and the edge 2016 of the drivablearea 2000. The present solution is not limited to the particulars ofFIG. 20 .

In 1910, the computing device determines, for each index point of thetrajectory within the interval(s), a first desired acceleration based onthe first distance and a second desired acceleration based on the seconddistance. For example, with reference to FIG. 20 , the distanceD_(vehicle-trajectory) associated with index point 2012 is used toobtain a first desired acceleration value from a stored LUT orcalibration file, while distance D_(vehicle-edge) is used to obtain asecond desired acceleration value from a stored LUT or calibration file.The present solution is not limited in this regard. The computing deviceselects, for each index point, the first or second desired accelerationvalue with the largest or maximum value, as shown by 1912. The selecteddesired acceleration values are referred to as final desiredacceleration values.

In 1914, the computing device performs operations to determine whether asingle object is at issue. If so [1914:YES], then 1916 is performedwhere the computing device selects the smallest final desiredacceleration value for limiting the vehicle's acceleration over anentire interval (for example, interval 2010 of FIG. 20 ). The selectedfinal desired acceleration value may be optionally adjusted in 1922based on the class of the object. For example, the acceleration value isreduced by a first pre-defined amount when the object is classified as apedestrian and reduced by a second different pre-defined amount when theobject is classified as a cyclist. The present solution is not limitedto the particulars of this example. The acceleration value mayalternatively be increased based on the object's classification. Theselected final desired acceleration value is then used in 1924 to limitthe vehicle's acceleration over the interval associated with the objectat issue (for example, object 2004 of FIG. 20 ). Subsequently, 1926 isperformed where method 1900 ends or other operations are performed.

When there are two or more objects at issue [1914:NO], then thecomputing device selects the smallest final desired acceleration for allobjects at each index point in the intervals, as shown by 1918. In 1920,the computing device uses a refining algorithm to generate resultantacceleration values using the selected final desired accelerations. Therefining algorithm can include, but is not limited to, a machinelearning algorithm that is trained to generate resultant accelerationvalues based on context information derived from sensor data. Thecontext information can include, but is not limited to, relativelocations of vehicle and objects, position of vehicle, position ofobject, vehicle trajectory, predicted object trajectory, objectclassification, direction of travel for the vehicle, and/or direction oftravel for the object. The resultant acceleration values may beoptionally adjusted in 1922 based on the class of the object. Forexample, a resultant acceleration value is reduced by a firstpre-defined amount when the object is classified as a pedestrian andreduced by a second different pre-defined amount when the object isclassified as a cyclist. The present solution is not limited to theparticulars of this example. The acceleration value may alternatively beincreased based on the object's classification. The selected finaldesired acceleration value is then used in 1924 to limit the vehicle'sacceleration over the interval associated with the object at issue (forexample, object 2004 of FIG. 20 ). Subsequently, 1926 is performed wheremethod 1900 ends or other operations are performed.

FIG. 21 provides graphs that are useful for understanding how avehicle's acceleration may be limited in accordance with method 1900 ofFIG. 19 . More specifically, graph 2100 illustrates how much to limit avehicle's acceleration based on distance D_(vehicle-trajectory). Graph2102 illustrates how much to limit a vehicle's acceleration based onedge distance D_(vehicle-edge). Graph 2104 shows the overlap of graphs2100 and 2102. The maximum values of the graphs 2100 and 2102 are usedto limit the vehicle's acceleration. The present solution is not limitedto the particulars of FIG. 21 .

FIG. 22 provides an illustration that is useful for understanding how avehicle's acceleration is limited in scenarios where the desiredaccelerations vary over the interval. In this case, the minimumacceleration is applied over the entire interval to limit the vehicle'sacceleration.

FIG. 23 provides an illustration that is useful for understanding howthe vehicle's acceleration is limited in scenarios where the vehiclewill pass multiple objects. In this case, the minimum acceleration ateach index point is used as inputs to a refining algorithm to determinethe amounts by which the vehicle's acceleration is to be limited overthe intervals associated with the objects.

FIG. 24 provides a flow diagram of another method 2400 for controllingacceleration of a vehicle. Method 2400 can be performed at leastpartially by an on-board computing device (for example, on-boardcomputing device 122 of FIG. 1 and/or vehicle on-board computing device220 of FIG. 2 ) of the vehicle and/or another computing device (forexample, server 110 of FIG. 1 and/or computer system 300 of FIG. 3 ).

Method 2400 begins with 2402 and continues with 2404 where the computingdevice processes sensor data to detect a lateral distance from atrajectory of the vehicle to an object the vehicle is expected to pass.The lateral distance may be detected by, for example: selecting an indexpoint from a plurality of index points of the trajectory that is alignedwith a center of the object; determining a distance between the selectedindex point and an edge of the object; and considering the distance asthe lateral distance. The lateral distance is compared to a thresholdvalue in 2406.

In 2408-2412, the computing device further processes the sensor data to:detect whether the object is located entirely inside a non-drivable areafor the vehicle and at an edge of a drivable area for the vehicle;whether the object is located partially inside a drivable area for thevehicle; and/or whether the object is a moving object biased in adrivable area for vehicle.

In 2414, the computing device causes the vehicle to perform operationsfor autonomous driving with or without acceleration limiting based onresults from the comparison operation of 2406, the detection if 2408,the detection of 2410 and/or the detection of 2412. For example, thevehicle is caused to perform operations for autonomous driving withacceleration limiting when (i) the lateral distance is less than thethreshold value, (ii) the object is located entirely inside thenon-drivable area and at the edge of the drivable area, (iii) the objectis located partially inside the drivable area for the vehicle and/or(iv) the object is a moving object biased in the drivable area for thevehicle. Alternatively, the vehicle is caused to perform operations forautonomous driving without acceleration limiting when (i) the lateraldistance is greater than the threshold value, (ii) the object is locatedentirely inside the non-drivable area but away from the edge of thedrivable area (iii) the object is not at least partially located insidethe drivable area for the vehicle, and/or (iv) the object is not amoving object biased in the drivable area for the vehicle.

2414 can involve obtaining an amount by which the acceleration of thevehicle is to be limited. The amount of acceleration limiting can beobtained by: defining an interval with a first end a given distance fromthe object and a second opposing the given distance from the object;obtaining a distance between the object and each index point of thetrajectory within the interval; obtaining a desired acceleration foreach said index point of the trajectory based on the respective one ofthe distances; and selecting the smallest value from the desiredaccelerations for limiting acceleration of the vehicle. Each of thedesired acceleration may be combined with a weight prior to selectingthe smallest desired acceleration. The smallest value may be adjustedbased on a class of the object.

The amount of acceleration limiting can alternatively be obtained by:defining an interval with a first end a given distance from the objectand a second opposing the given distance from the object; and performingoperations for each index point of a plurality of index points of thetrajectory that are located in the interval. These operations involve:obtaining a first distance between a vehicle margin when the vehicle islocated adjacent to the object and each index point of the trajectorywithin the interval and a second distance between the vehicle's machinewhen the vehicle is located adjacent to the object and an edge ofdrivable area for the vehicle; obtaining a first desired accelerationbased on the first distance and a second desired acceleration based onthe second distance; and selecting a largest one of the first and seconddesired accelerations as a final desired acceleration. The smallestvalue is selected from the final desired accelerations for limitingacceleration of the vehicle. The smallest value may be adjusted based ona class of the object.

Referring now to FIG. 25 , there is a flow diagram of another method2500 for selectively limiting acceleration of a vehicle. Method 2500 canbe performed at least partially by an on-board computing device (forexample, on-board computing device 122 of FIG. 1 and/or vehicle on-boardcomputing device 220 of FIG. 2 ) of the vehicle and/or another computingdevice (for example, server 110 of FIG. 1 and/or computer system 300 ofFIG. 3 ).

Method 2500 begins with 2502 and continues with 2504 where the computingdevice processes sensor data to detect a lateral distance from a pointon a trajectory of the vehicle to an object the vehicle is expected topass when following the trajectory. The object is located off of and toa side of the trajectory. The point represents a future location of thevehicle while passing the object. The lateral distance may be detectedby, for example: selecting an index point from a plurality of indexpoints of the trajectory that is aligned with a center of the objectoffset to a side of the trajectory; determining a distance between theselected index point and an edge of the object; and considering thedistance as the lateral distance.

In 2506-2508, the computing device may compare the lateral distance to athreshold value and select whether acceleration limiting is to beperformed by the vehicle based on results of the comparison. Thecomputing device may cause the vehicle to perform operations in 2518 forautonomous driving with or without acceleration limiting based on itsselection. For example, acceleration limiting is selected when thelateral distance is less than the threshold value.

The computing device may additionally or alternatively performoperations to: detect whether the object is located entirely inside anon-drivable area for the vehicle and at an edge of a drivable area forthe vehicle; detect whether the object is located partially inside adrivable area for the vehicle; and/or detect whether the object is amoving object biased in a drivable area for vehicle. The computingdevice may cause the vehicle to perform operations in 2518 forautonomous driving with or without acceleration limiting based on one ormore of these detections. For example, the vehicle is caused to performthe operations for autonomous driving without acceleration limiting when(i) the lateral distance is greater than the threshold value, (ii) theobject is located entirely inside the non-drivable area but away fromthe edge of the drivable area, (iii) the object is not at leastpartially located inside the drivable area for the vehicle, and/or (iv)the object is not a moving object biased in the drivable area for thevehicle. The vehicle is caused to perform the operations in 2518 forautonomous driving with acceleration limiting when (i) the lateraldistance is less than the threshold value, (ii) the object is locatedentirely inside the non-drivable area and at the edge of the drivablearea, (iii) the object is located partially inside the drivable area forthe vehicle; and/or (iv) the object is a moving object biased in thedrivable area for the vehicle. The amount of acceleration can bedetermined in the same or similar manners as described above.Subsequently, 2520 is performed where method 2500 ends or otheroperations are performed.

As described above, the present solution concerns implementing systemsand methods for controlling acceleration of a vehicle. The methods maycomprise performing the following operations by a computing device:detecting a lateral distance from a point on a trajectory of the vehicleto a first object the vehicle is expected to pass when following thetrajectory (where the first object is located off of and to a side ofthe trajectory and the point representing a future location of thevehicle while passing the first object); selecting whether accelerationlimiting is to be performed by the vehicle based on the lateraldistance; obtaining an amount by which the acceleration of the vehicleis to be limited, when a selection is made that acceleration limiting isto be performed by the vehicle; and causing the vehicle to performoperations for autonomous driving with limiting of acceleration by theobtained amount.

In some scenarios, the amount by which acceleration of the vehicle is tobe limited can be obtained by: defining an interval with a first endlocated a pre-defined distance from the first object and a secondopposing end located the pre-defined distance from the first object;obtaining a distance between the first object and each index point ofthe trajectory within the interval; obtaining a desired acceleration foreach said index point of the trajectory based on the respective one ofthe distances; selecting the smallest value from the desiredaccelerations for limiting acceleration of the vehicle; and/or adjustingthe smallest value based on a class of the object. The desiredacceleration may be obtained using a look-up table comprising aplurality of different acceleration values that are indexed by aplurality of different distance values. The smallest value may beadjusted by a first amount when the object is associated with a firstclass and by a second different amount when the object is associatedwith a second different class.

In those or other scenarios, the vehicle is expected to additionallypass a second object. Thus, the amount by which acceleration of thevehicle is to be limited can be obtained by, for each of the first andsecond objects: defining an interval with a first end located apre-defined distance from the first or second object and a secondopposing end located the pre-defined distance from the first or secondobject; obtaining a distance between the first or second object and eachindex point of the trajectory within the interval; obtaining a desiredacceleration for each said index point of the trajectory based on therespective one of the distances; selecting a smallest value from thedesired accelerations for the first and second object at each indexpoint of the trajectory; generating resultant acceleration value(s)using the selected smallest values; and/or adjusting the resultantacceleration value(s) based on at least one of a classification of thefirst object and a classification of the second object.

The resultant acceleration value(s) may be generated by a machinelearning algorithm that is trained to generate resultant accelerationvalues based on context information derived from sensor data. Thecontext information can include, but is not limited to, a relativelocation of vehicle and the first object, a relative location of thevehicle and the second object, a position of vehicle, a position offirst object, a position of the second object, the trajectory, apredicted trajectory for the first object, a predicted trajectory forthe second object, a classification of the first object, aclassification of the second object, a direction of travel for thevehicle, a direction of travel for the first object, and/or a directionof travel for the second object.

In those or other scenarios, the selection at to whether accelerationlimiting is to be performed by the vehicle can be further based onwhether the first object is located entirely inside a non-drivable areafor the vehicle and at an edge of a drivable area for the vehicle,whether the first object is located partially inside a drivable area forthe vehicle, and/or whether the first object is a moving object biasedin a drivable area for the vehicle.

As described above, the present solution additionally or alternativelyconcerns implementing systems and methods for controlling accelerationof a vehicle. The methods may comprise performing the followingoperations by computing device(s): detecting a lateral distance from apoint on a trajectory of the vehicle to a first object the vehicle isexpected to pass when following the trajectory (where the first objectbeing located off of and to a side of the trajectory and the pointrepresenting a future location of the vehicle while passing the firstobject); selecting whether acceleration limiting is to be performed bythe vehicle based on the lateral distance; obtaining a margin of thevehicle defined by a sequence of points; obtaining an amount by whichthe acceleration of the vehicle is to be limited based on the trajectoryand the margin of the vehicle, when a selection is made thatacceleration limiting is to be performed by the vehicle; and causing thevehicle to perform operations for autonomous driving with limiting ofacceleration by the obtained amount.

The sequence of points may be obtained by: sliding a footprint of thevehicle longitudinally along the trajectory; and for each index point ofthe trajectory, sliding the footprint laterally until the footprintintersects with the first object, and obtaining a vehicle center orcenter of gravity specified by the footprint at a laterally slidlocation intersecting the first object.

In some scenarios, the amount by which the acceleration of the vehicleis to be limited may be obtained by defining an interval with a firstend that is located a pre-defined distance from the first object and asecond opposing that is located the pre-defined distance from the firstobject. For each index point of a plurality of index points of thetrajectory that are located in the interval, performing the followingoperations: obtaining a first distance between the margin of the vehicleand each index point of the trajectory within the interval and a seconddistance between the margin of the vehicle and an edge of drivable areafor the vehicle; obtaining a first desired acceleration based on thefirst distance and a second desired acceleration based on the seconddistance; and selecting a largest one of the first and second desiredaccelerations as a final desired acceleration. The smallest value may beselected from the final desired accelerations for limiting accelerationof the vehicle. The first and second desired accelerations may beobtained using look-up tables each comprising a plurality of differentacceleration values that are indexed by a plurality of differentdistance values. The selected smallest value may be adjusted based on aclass of the object. The smallest value may be adjusted by a firstamount when the object is associated with a first class and by a seconddifferent amount when the object is associated with a second differentclass.

In those or other scenarios, the vehicle is expected to additionallypass a second object. The amount by which the acceleration of thevehicle is to be limited may be obtained by, for each of the first andsecond objects: defining an interval with a first end that is located apre-defined distance from the first or second object and a secondopposing that is located the pre-defined distance from the first orsecond object; and for each index point of a plurality of index pointsof the trajectory that are located in the interval, obtaining a firstdistance between the margin of the vehicle and each index point of thetrajectory within the interval and a second distance between the marginof the vehicle and an edge of drivable area for the vehicle, obtaining afirst desired acceleration based on the first distance and a seconddesired acceleration based on the second distance, and selecting alargest one of the first and second desired accelerations as a finaldesired acceleration. A smallest value is selected from the finaldesired accelerations for the first and second objects at each indexpoint of the trajectory that are located in the interval. Resultantacceleration value(s) is(are) generated using the selected smallestvalues. The resultant acceleration value(s) may be generated by amachine learning algorithm that is trained to generate resultantacceleration values based on context information derived from sensordata. The context information can include, but is not limited to, arelative location of vehicle and the first object, a relative locationof the vehicle and the second object, a position of vehicle, a positionof first object, a position of the second object, the trajectory, apredicted trajectory for the first object, a predicted trajectory forthe second object, a classification of the first object, aclassification of the second object, a direction of travel for thevehicle, a direction of travel for the first object, and/or a directionof travel for the second object. The resultant acceleration value(s) maybe adjusted based on a classification of the first object and/or aclassification of the second object.

The above-described methods improve overall performance of autonomousvehicles. By implementing the above-described methods, the autonomousvehicles are able to pass nearby obstacles more comfortably usingmoderate acceleration, able to be more relaxed around pedestrianpresence, and able to pass objects inside the drivable area withouthaving to limited its positive acceleration.

The implementing systems of the above-described method(s) can comprise:a processor; and a non-transitory computer-readable storage mediumcomprising programming instructions that are configured to cause theprocessor to implement a method for operating an automated system. Theabove-described methods can also be implemented by a computer programproduct comprising a memory and programming instructions that areconfigured to cause a processor to perform operations.

It is to be appreciated that the Detailed Description section, and notany other section, is intended to be used to interpret the claims. Othersections can set forth one or more but not all exemplary embodiments ascontemplated by the inventor(s), and thus, are not intended to limitthis disclosure or the appended claims in any way.

While this disclosure describes exemplary embodiments for exemplaryfields and applications, it should be understood that the disclosure isnot limited thereto. Other embodiments and modifications thereto arepossible and are within the scope and spirit of this disclosure. Forexample, and without limiting the generality of this paragraph,embodiments are not limited to the software, hardware, firmware, and/orentities illustrated in the figures and/or described herein. Further,embodiments (whether or not explicitly described herein) havesignificant utility to fields and applications beyond the examplesdescribed herein.

Embodiments have been described herein with the aid of functionalbuilding blocks illustrating the implementation of specified functionsand relationships thereof. The boundaries of these functional buildingblocks have been arbitrarily defined herein for the convenience of thedescription. Alternate boundaries can be defined as long as thespecified functions and relationships (or equivalents thereof) areappropriately performed. Also, alternative embodiments can performfunctional blocks, steps, operations, methods, etc. using orderingsdifferent than those described herein.

References herein to “one embodiment,” “an embodiment,” “an exampleembodiment,” or similar phrases, indicate that the embodiment describedcan include a particular feature, structure, or characteristic, butevery embodiment can not necessarily include the particular feature,structure, or characteristic. Moreover, such phrases are not necessarilyreferring to the same embodiment. Further, when a particular feature,structure, or characteristic is described in connection with anembodiment, it would be within the knowledge of persons skilled in therelevant art(s) to incorporate such feature, structure, orcharacteristic into other embodiments whether or not explicitlymentioned or described herein. Additionally, some embodiments can bedescribed using the expression “coupled” and “connected” along withtheir derivatives. These terms are not necessarily intended as synonymsfor each other. For example, some embodiments can be described using theterms “connected” and/or “coupled” to indicate that two or more elementsare in direct physical or electrical contact with each other. The term“coupled,” however, can also mean that two or more elements are not indirect contact with each other, but yet still co-operate or interactwith each other.

The breadth and scope of this disclosure should not be limited by any ofthe above-described exemplary embodiments but should be defined only inaccordance with the following claims and their equivalents.

What is claimed is:
 1. A method for controlling acceleration of avehicle, comprising: detecting, by a computing device, a lateraldistance from a point on a trajectory of the vehicle to an object thevehicle is expected to pass when following the trajectory, the objectbeing located off of and to a side of the trajectory and the pointrepresenting a future location of the vehicle while passing the object;comparing, by the computing device, the lateral distance to a thresholdvalue; selecting, by the computing device, whether acceleration limitingis to be performed by the vehicle based on whether the lateral distanceis less than the threshold value; and causing, by the computing device,the vehicle to perform operations for autonomous driving with or withoutacceleration limiting based on said selecting.
 2. The method accordingto claim 1, wherein detecting the lateral distance comprises: selectingan index point from a plurality of index points of the trajectory, theselected index point being aligned with a center of the object offset tothe side of the trajectory; and determining a distance between theselected index point and an edge of the object, wherein the lateraldistance is the determined distance.
 3. The method according to claim 1,further comprising: detecting, by the computing device, whether theobject is located entirely inside a non-drivable area for the vehicleand at an edge of a drivable area for the vehicle, wherein the selectingis further based on detecting whether the object is located entirelyinside a non-drivable area for the vehicle and at an edge of a drivablearea for the vehicle.
 4. The method according to claim 3, wherein thevehicle is caused to perform the operations for autonomous drivingwithout acceleration limiting when the object is located entirely insidethe non-drivable area and away from the edge of the drivable area. 5.The method according to claim 3, wherein the vehicle is caused toperform the operations for autonomous driving with acceleration limitingwhen the object is located entirely inside the non-drivable area and atthe edge of the drivable area.
 6. The method according to claim 1,further comprising: detecting, by the computing device, whether theobject is located partially inside a drivable area for the vehicle,wherein the selecting is further based in the detecting.
 7. The methodaccording to claim 6, wherein the vehicle is caused to perform theoperations for autonomous driving without acceleration limiting when theobject is not at least partially located inside the drivable area forthe vehicle.
 8. The method according to claim 6, wherein the vehicle iscaused to perform the operations for autonomous driving withacceleration limiting when the object is located partially inside thedrivable area for the vehicle.
 9. The method according to claim 1,further comprising: detecting, by the computing device, whether theobject is a moving object biased in a drivable area for the vehicle,wherein the selecting is further based in the detecting.
 10. The methodaccording to claim 9, wherein the vehicle is caused to perform theoperations for autonomous driving without acceleration limiting when theobject is not a moving object biased in the drivable area for thevehicle.
 11. The method according to claim 9, wherein the vehicle iscaused to perform the operations for autonomous driving withacceleration limiting when the object is a moving object biased in thedrivable area for the vehicle.
 12. A system, comprising: a processor; anon-transitory computer-readable storage medium comprising programminginstructions that are configured to cause the processor to implement amethod for controlling acceleration of a vehicle, wherein theprogramming instructions comprise instructions to: detect a lateraldistance from a point on a trajectory of the vehicle to an object thevehicle is expected to pass when following the trajectory, the objectbeing located off of and to a side of the trajectory and the pointrepresenting a future location of the vehicle while passing the object;compare the lateral distance to a threshold value; select whetheracceleration limiting is to be performed by the vehicle based on whetherthe lateral distance is less than the threshold value; and cause thevehicle to perform operations for autonomous driving with or withoutacceleration limiting based on the selecting.
 13. The system accordingto claim 12, wherein the lateral distance is detected by: selecting anindex point from a plurality of index points of the trajectory, theselected index point being aligned with a center of the object offset tothe side of the trajectory, and determining a distance between theselected index point and an edge of the object, wherein the lateraldistance is the determined distance.
 14. The system according to claim12, wherein the programming instructions further comprise instructionsto: detect whether the object is located entirely inside a non-drivablearea for the vehicle and at an edge of a drivable area for the vehicle,wherein the selection of whether acceleration limiting is to beperformed is further based on whether the object is located entirelyinside a non-drivable area for the vehicle and at an edge of a drivablearea for the vehicle.
 15. The system according to claim 14, wherein thevehicle is caused to perform the operations for autonomous drivingwithout acceleration limiting when the object is located entirely insidethe non-drivable area and away from the edge of the drivable area, orperform the operations for autonomous driving with acceleration limitingwhen the object is located entirely inside the non-drivable area and atthe edge of the drivable area.
 16. The system according to claim 12,wherein the programming instructions further comprise instructions to:detect whether the object is located partially inside a drivable areafor the vehicle, wherein the selection of whether acceleration limitingis to be performed is further based on whether the object is locatedpartially inside a drivable area for the vehicle.
 17. The systemaccording to claim 16, wherein the vehicle is caused to perform theoperations for autonomous driving without acceleration limiting when theobject is not at least partially located inside the drivable area forthe vehicle, or perform the operations for autonomous driving withacceleration limiting when the object is located partially inside thedrivable area for the vehicle.
 18. The system according to claim 12,wherein the programming instructions further comprise instructions to:detect whether the object is a moving object biased in a drivable areafor the vehicle, wherein the selecting is further based in thedetecting.
 19. The method according to claim 10, wherein the vehicle iscaused to perform the operations for autonomous driving withoutacceleration limiting when the object is not a moving object biased inthe drivable area for the vehicle, or perform the operations forautonomous driving with acceleration limiting when the object is amoving object biased in the drivable area for the vehicle.
 20. Anon-transitory computer-readable medium that stores instructions that isconfigured to, when executed by at least one computing device, cause theat least one computing device to perform operations comprising:detecting a lateral distance from a point on a trajectory of the vehicleto an object the vehicle is expected to pass when following thetrajectory, the object being located off of and to a side of thetrajectory and the point representing a future location of the vehiclewhile passing the object; comparing the lateral distance to a thresholdvalue; selecting whether acceleration limiting is to be performed by thevehicle based on whether the lateral distance is less than the thresholdvalue; and causing the vehicle to perform operations for autonomousdriving with or without acceleration limiting based on the selecting.